Skip to content
Advertisements

Shaking The Hell Outta That Etch-A-Sketch (Lady Edition)

October 10, 2012

Etch-a-Sketch Mitt — Ladies’ Edition

For me, the real story of the first presidential debate wasn’t Obama’s weak performance, but rather the ‘October Surprise’ that the GOP is now fielding a completely new candidate!  This new “moderate” Mitt has something for everyone — except Big Bird, of course.

Continuing his amazing pandering pivot to the center, Romney yesterday told the editorial board of the Des Moines Register:

“There’s no legislation with regards to abortion that I’m familiar with that would become part of my agenda.”

Whew! It’s okay ladies, we can breathe easy and vote for Mitt now we know he’s not going to mess with our reproductive rights!

But wait:

The Romney campaign walked back the remark within two hours of the Register posting its story. Spokeswoman Andrea Saul told National Review Online’s Katrina Trinko that Romney “would of course support legislation aimed at providing greater protections for life.” (HuffPost)

Confused? Who do you believe — Mitt Romney or Mitt Romney two hours later? Let’s go to the tape:  Not long ago, Romney posted his official “Pro-Life Pledge” at the National Review Online. A few tidbits:

 And as president, I will support efforts to prohibit federal funding for any organization like Planned Parenthood, which primarily performs abortions or offers abortion-related services.

[…]

I will advocate for and support a Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act to protect unborn children who are capable of feeling pain from abortion.

[…]

I will reinstate the Mexico City Policy to ensure that nongovernmental organizations that receive funding from America refrain from performing or promoting abortion services, as a method of family planning, in other countries.  This includes ending American funding for any United Nations or other foreign assistance program that promotes or performs abortions on women around the world.

Now maybe I’m just some silly woman, but there seem to be serious inconsistencies here. Either Mitt’s lying to us now or he was lying to us then. But here’s one clear fact: the only thing Mitt Romney has been consistent about is his willingness to say anything he thinks he needs to say.

Advertisements
2 Comments leave one →
  1. October 10, 2012 10:54 am

    As usual you are so right on the money it’s scary. Romney must be the squishiest, most malleable presidential candidate in history. A man who will say or do absolutely anything to become president. What does he really stand for? Why are his plans always so vague? Why does half the country seem ready for fall for his bullshit? Why does he change his mind so often and so quickly?

    In the next debate I hope Obama comes at him with this and more but from an angle Romney totally doesn’t expect so he won’t be able to play all of his cute pre-planned sound bite responses. Maybe then he’ll be caught flat-footed enough to reveal his true nature.

    Obama! Go squishy or go home.

  2. October 10, 2012 10:54 am

    You can say that again…in another way…meaning the complete opposite…to a different group of people…if you are Mittens…or his staff.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: